Rupert Grint shines brightly in the somewhat Shakespearean love comedy he finds himself in, and makes the most of his new-found sport hero popularity. The young leads have all matured in pace with the maturing content of the books and their acting shows it.
Just like the book, this movie leaves you aching to see how it all ends (never mind the fact that you already know). And the lack of closure at the end of the movie is no accident, I believe. He manages to capture the lingering lightness of that time before the serious business of adulthood sets in, alongside the relentless buildup to the final showdown between The Dark Lord and The Chosen One. But Yates' truly gutsy adaptation really works and brings a depth and clarity to the main themes of the book that is quite extraordinary. Purist fans will most certainly complain bitterly about numerous sub-plots, events and characters that were cut from the movie and the odd scene that doesn't exist in the book. You are likely to leave the cinema filled with a heart-wrenching sadness for innocence lost. If you've seen all the movies up to now or read all the books, and your are at an age to appreciate the adult themes and movie techniques, this movie should fall pitch-perfect on your ear. Haven't we all been there at some stage of our lives? All in all, Harry Potter is growing up. The romance was aimed perfectly at the young teen market, and I found myself cringing ruefully at some of Lavender Brown's love-obsessed stunts and smiling wistfully at the tenderness between Harry and Ginny. Harry (Daniel Radcliffe), Hermione (Emma Watson) and Ron (Rupert Grint) all find themselves dealing with the vagaries of young love - from dealing with unwanted advances to finding love in unexpected places. Some people feel that the romantic comedy aspects played too large a role in the movie, but I felt this aspect added some much-needed lightness and human drama to the movie. My son missed seeing those - I was a lot more intrigued by the ominous undercurrents made palpable by the indomitable trio of David Yates (director), Steve Kloves (screenplay) and Delbonnel (photography). There are worse things in life to be afraid of than big hairy spiders. Most of the threatening and darkening tone of the movie was also lost upon him, whereas I reveled in the finer details contributing to a general sense of ever-encroaching darkness. My son certainly became fidgety, and didn't appreciate the finesse and sophistication of the plot and cinematic approach. For the younger lot, looking for frightening wizard duels and attacks by magical creatures, the first hour and a half of the movie drags on a bit. But only if you enjoy a plot line driven by character and emotion.
Personally, I felt the pace was spot-on and that the movie elegantly made time for all key plot points. The usual lush greenery and joyous train ride are nowhere to be seen.
The standard train trip to Hogwarts was particularly stark, seen against a landscape scorched by a hot summer sun and dotted with dark pools of water. The stripped landscapes and washed out colors convey a constant feeling of dread and foreboding. The movie impresses on many levels from an artistic point of view. And Yates, the production crew and the cast definitely delivered. With all the book details very fresh in my mind, I had high expectations of the movie. I finished the last book only three weeks before seeing the movie adaptation of Half-Blood Prince the first time. I only recently started counting myself a true Harry Potter fan after my son introduced me to the movies a couple of years ago. The two viewings give me the unique advantage of both the adult and the child perspective on the movie. I saw it a second time with my son who is not quite ten, but who is generally mature for his age and doesn't scare easily. I was lucky enough to see a preview of Half-Blood Prince three days before opening day.
0 kommentar(er)
